tailwind CSS vs normal CSS3

 A website or web application can be styled using either tailwind CSS or "normal" CSS, sometimes known as "vanilla" CSS or traditional CSS. Let's contrast them in different ways:

1. Approach:

Custom CSS rules must be written for each element, class, and ID in your HTML markup when using traditional CSS. To create the appropriate styles, a solid understanding of CSS attributes and selectors is necessary.

Tailwind CSS: Adopts a utility-first strategy, styling components directly in the HTML markup using pre-defined CSS utility classes. It offers a sizable collection of utility classes, which you can combine to build styles without writing bespoke CSS.

2. Writing Formats:

CSS the old-fashioned way: You provide your styles in individual CSS files or within style> tags in your HTML. To target particular items, you can use ID or class selectors.

Tailwind CSS: You can add styles using classes straight in the HTML. div class="bg-blue-500 text-white font-bold p-4"> is an illustration of this.

3. Learning Curve

Traditional CSS: Demands a better comprehension of the CSS language, including cascading, selectors, specificity, box modeling, etc. Although more difficult for novices, it offers finer-grained control.

Particularly for developers experienced with utility classes and who prefer a more organized approach to decorating, Tailwind CSS is relatively simpler to learn and utilize. Those who are accustomed to developing bespoke CSS may find the learning curve to be more challenging.

4. File Size

Traditional CSS: It can be rather lightweight if it is written effectively. But larger projects could have a lot of CSS code, which could result in larger file sizes.

Because it includes a large number of utility classes, Tailwind CSS has a bigger starting file size. To remove unneeded classes and minimize the final file size for production, you can use programs like PurgeCSS.

5. Flexibility:

CSS the way it has always been done: Gives you complete control over the styles and gives you more creative freedom. You can start from scratch and make original designs.

Tailwind CSS: Provides a standardized collection of utility classes, which might to some extent restrict the design options. But it enables quick creation and uniform designs across projects.

6. Maintenance:

Traditional CSS: If not organized appropriately, it may become more difficult to maintain and scale as a project grows. Selectors may become extremely picky or cause disputes.

CSS using the tailwind method is typically simpler to maintain because styles are contained within utility classes. The HTML classes can be easily changed to make changes to the design.

7. Community and Ecosystem:

Being the norm, traditional CSS has access to a wealth of information, documentation, and community assistance.

Although it has garnered popularity and a thriving community, the Tailwind CSS ecosystem may not be as large as the conventional CSS ecology.

In conclusion, your preference for development, the specifications of the project, and the level of experience on your team will determine whether you choose Tailwind CSS or conventional CSS. When quickly developing or creating projects with a consistent and organized approach to styling, Tailwind CSS can be especially helpful. However, conventional CSS is more adaptable and could be preferred for intricate and highly customized designs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Angular JS Course Roadmap

How can we motivated while coding?

What is rapid Api?